As part of my Junior Design project in the LSU Cain Department of Chemical Engineering, I collaborated with a team to evaluate two design options for generating low-pressure steam using hot diesel product streams. The goal was to optimize steam recovery while minimizing capital investment and ensuring process safety. This project simulated an industrial scenario requiring technical design, economic evaluation, and risk analysis to support data-driven engineering decisions.
Our team followed a structured engineering design and analysis process:
System Design and Simulation:
Developed process flow diagrams in Aspen Plus to model two configurations of waste heat steam generators. Simulations determined the steam generation rate for each option—Option 1: 13.3 klb/hr LPS and Option 2: 16.4 klb/hr LPS with additional MPS generation—while accounting for feedwater conditions and thermal efficiency.
Economic Analysis:
Conducted a Return on Investment (ROI) and cost-benefit assessment for each configuration:
Option 1: Total capital investment of $1.44 million with $137,000/year cost savings and a 21% ROI.
Option 2: Slightly higher capital investment but increased steam recovery and improved long-term returns.
Economic comparisons were visualized using an efficiency vs. area performance plot.
Process Safety and Hazard Evaluation:
Performed a Process Safety Index (PSI) and HAZOP-style risk assessment to identify key hazards associated with hot diesel flow and pump seal failures.
Identified combustibility hazards due to the low flash point of diesel.
Proposed secondary containment and automatic sprinkler systems to reduce incident probability and pool fire size.
Modeled potential leak and fire scenarios using orifice flow and flame spread calculations.
Source and Consequence Modeling:
Used fluid mechanics principles to estimate pool fire size and duration for a ¼-inch orifice leak, applying a consequence analysis to evaluate thermal radiation impacts on nearby equipment and personnel.
The study concluded that Option 2 offered the optimal balance of economic performance, thermal recovery, and process safety. The final design achieved higher energy efficiency and improved return on investment while maintaining compliance with safety standards.
This project strengthened my skills in process simulation (Aspen Plus), energy recovery design, economic evaluation, and hazard analysis, reflecting my ability to integrate technical, financial, and safety considerations in chemical process design.